Could a political party take advantage of information society’s beneficial qualities to inform other parties through the voting protocol knowing they will be a minor party? Is the American Intelligentsia able to come together toward the purpose of informed democracy under the label without becoming a hypocritical institution? What self constitutional promises must be made and kept in order to preserve a party’s status as pure in this age?
Because there is corruption some believe that the party would need to accept that money is an important part of it’s process of information reconciliation. The U.S. Constitution has been attacked by presidential and congression powers of what they are calling oversight but is really an armflex of the intellgence community as it achieved a new unified status. While the intelligence community has guaranteed a stable America as we steer through potential crises, it has not adequately announced the upholding of strong judicial powers for our nation; I believe this itself is a crisis.
The Green Party of America has been attacked in its communication structure somehow here in Los Angeles, California. Although people have tried to assert that people with values of nature and system economics are not disciplined, this is far from true. We have had many green party member in government since the Green Party’s inception.
I propose that members of the Informed Democracy party meet elite standards of the modern information society in order to obtain status as a representative of the party. Although the party will have candidates and registered voters, it will consider itself subject to specific values regarding politics and information. If the intellectuals, artists, geeks, clowns, writers, nerds, poets, engineers, scientists, hard core businessmen, and geniuses of our society cannot accept someone as a representative of the Informed Democracy party, perhaps they have some contributing to do to society rather than the I.D. parties’ pocketbook. Regarding pocketbook, the party will be able to exceed bribery by the use of public broadcasting standards of information casting.
In the past fears of Stalinism have limited our voice in challenging the American political system. We cannot bury good practice under rhetoric and succeed well on the world stage of business without the assistance of our peers in the arts and sciences. They are able to assist us in determining what is needed for the future. As social beings and even politicians we sometimes look to charming prophets for help in what people will believe in what we say. But if we can use an opinion tree structure of expert knowledge that is protected by money rather than merely swayed by it, in this day of great goods of plenty, we will be able to eat from it’s horn.
We can really have that structure if allow the Informed Democracy party to self-elect by public broadcasting standards of public intellectual and also allow the constitution of it and our social conscience to fund it, seperating individual donations by belief and affiliation. Thus we can have individual members who do give as much as but no more than a tithe, like a churchfaith believer, yet are doubtful and cautious regarding election, and meet the well reasoned criteria set forth by the base constitution for the whole lot of electees. Furthermore corporations and churches may only donate if their business interests are in fair alignment with the branch of research or art or practice covered by the party, and the information presented meet the standards of art, science, elegance, and simplicity demanded by the party constitution. It is my belief that this will improve the information available to politicians in America. They are not paying Forrester I have noticed.
